Welcome to buy cheap D2R Items, FC Coins, Madden Coins and NBA 2K MT at UTPLAY.COM. Google Safety Google Safe
Language EN
  • EN EN
  • FR FR
  • DE DE
  • NL NL
  • ES ES
  • IT IT
  • PT PT
Giveaways Boss Drop
FC 24 Formations Tier List (2024): Ranking Best Formations in EAFC 24
2/21/2024 3:00:02 PM

In this guide, we break down the best formations tier list in FC 24 helping you choose the best tactics for your Ultimate Team. Whether you're a seasoned tactician or just getting started, this ranking is your key to unlocking the full potential of your squad in FC 24.


FC 24 Formations Tier List (2024): Ranking Best Formations in EAFC 24

When it comes to FC 24 formations, there are numerous options available to players. Each formation has its own strengths and weaknesses, and finding the right one for your playstyle can greatly impact your success on the pitch. Whether you're looking for the best attacking formation or the best defending formation, this tier list is the best for you - covering the best FC 24 formations in 2024, based on their effectiveness and popularity among players.


S Tier 

  • 4-3-2-1: This formation, also known as the "Christmas Tree" formation, is an attack-oriented formation with a strong attacking presence. It consists of a single striker, two wingers, and a midfield trio. The custom tactics for this formation include a balanced defensive style, direct passing for chance creation, and players instructed to get in behind and stay central. To counter this formation, formations with a stronger midfield presence, like 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, can be effective.

  • 4-2-1-3: Versatile midfield allows transitions between attack/defense quickly. RAM/LAM provide options,2 STs a threat. Well-balanced.

  • 4-2-3-1: The 4-2-3-1 formation is considered beginner-friendly and offers a balanced approach to offense and defense. It includes two central defensive midfielders for better midfield control. The custom tactics for this formation include a balanced defensive style, forward runs for chance creation, and players instructed to join the attack and overlap. To counter this formation, formations with midfield dominance, like 4-3-3, can be effective.

  • 4-4-2:  Old classic remains solid with goal threats at ST, AM roles interchangeable for variability. Good width, numbers in midfield.

  • 4-3-1-2: Controls possession easily. Versatile with 3 CMs, RAM/LAM provide outlets. CAM links to 2 STs. Tough nut to crack.

  • 4-2-2-2: Extremely balanced. Solid midfield pivot allows flexibility. RAM/LAM interchangeable. Anchored wings with scoring threats.


A Tier

  • 4-1-2-1-2 (2): This formation features a diamond midfield, with a defensive midfielder, two central midfielders, and an attacking midfielder, providing a balanced approach to offense and defense.

  • 5-4-1 (2): The 5-4-1 formation focuses on a solid defensive structure with five defenders and a compact midfield, making it difficult for opponents to break through.


B Tier

  • 4-2-4: This formation is more attacking-oriented with two central midfielders and four forwards, but it may leave gaps in the midfield and defense.

  • 3-5-2: This formation features three central defenders, five midfielders, and two forwards, offering a balanced approach to both offense and defense.

  • 4-1-3-2: This formation focuses on a strong midfield presence with a defensive midfielder, three central midfielders, and two forwards, providing versatility in both defense and offense.

  • 4-2-3-1 (2): Similar to the 4-2-3-1 formation mentioned in the S Tier, this formation offers a balanced approach to offense and defense.

  • 4-4-2 (2): Similar to the 4-4-2 formation mentioned in the S Tier, this formation is versatile and balanced, with a strong emphasis on both defense and offense.


C Tier

  • 3-1-4-2: This formation features three defenders, one defensive midfielder, four midfielders, and two strikers. The main issue with this formation is the lack of width in midfield, which can make it difficult to create effective attacking opportunities. Additionally, the lone defensive midfielder may struggle to provide enough cover for the defense.

  • 3-4-1-2: Similar to the previous formation, the lack of width in midfield is a concern. This formation relies heavily on the wing-backs to provide width, which can leave the defense vulnerable to counter-attacks. The central attacking midfielder may also find it challenging to link up with the strikers effectively.

  • 4-3-3: This formation is a classic formation, but it may not be as effective in FC 24 due to certain gameplay mechanics. The lack of a dedicated defensive midfielder can leave the defense exposed, and the wide attacking players may struggle to contribute defensively. Additionally, the central striker may become isolated without enough support from the midfield.

  • 3-4-2-1: This formation suffers from similar issues as the 3-4-1-2 formation, with a lack of width in midfield and potential defensive vulnerabilities. The two attacking midfielders may find it challenging to create consistent goal-scoring opportunities without proper support from the wider areas.

  • 3-4-3: This formation can be quite attacking-minded, but it may leave the defense exposed with only three defenders. The lack of a dedicated defensive midfielder can make it difficult to protect the backline effectively. Additionally, the wide attacking players may struggle to contribute defensively.

  • 4-1-2-1-2: This formation is a narrow diamond shape that provides a compact midfield and allows for quick passing combinations. It can be effective in controlling the game and creating scoring opportunities.

  • 4-1-4-1: Similar to the 4-1-2-1-2 formation, the lack of width in midfield can hinder the team's attacking capabilities. The lone striker may also become isolated without enough support from the midfield.

  • 4-3-3 (2): This variation of the 4-3-3 formation may suffer from similar issues as the standard 4-3-3 formation, with potential defensive vulnerabilities and a lack of support for the central striker.

  • 4-3-3 (5): This formation, also known as the "False 9" formation, can be challenging to execute effectively. The lack of a traditional striker can make it difficult to create goal-scoring opportunities, and the central attacking midfielder may struggle to provide enough attacking threat.

  • 4-3-3 (3): This formation, with a defensive midfielder and two central midfielders, may lack the necessary balance in midfield. The wide attacking players may also struggle to contribute defensively, leaving the team vulnerable on the flanks.

  • 4-4-1-1 (2): This formation can be quite defensive-minded, with two banks of four players. However, it may lack attacking options, with only one striker and limited support from the midfield.

  • 4-4-1-1: Similar to the previous formation, the lack of attacking options can make it challenging to create consistent goal-scoring opportunities. The team may struggle to break down well-organized defenses.

  • 4-3-3 (4): The 4-3-3 (4) formation is an attacking formation with three forwards and a midfield trio. It offers width and the ability to stretch the opponent's defense, creating space for attacking opportunities.

  • 4-5-1: This formation can be quite defensive-minded, with five midfielders providing cover for the defense. However, it may lack attacking options, with only one striker and limited support from the midfield.

  • 5-2-1-2: This formation features three central defenders and two wing-backs, which can provide defensive solidity. However, the lack of width in midfield may limit the team's attacking capabilities, and the lone striker may struggle to find space in the opposition's defense.

  • 5-2-2-1: Similar to the In FC 24, there are several formations that are considered to be in the C Tier. These formations may have certain weaknesses or limitations that make them less effective compared to higher-tier formations. Let's take a closer look at each of these formations and discuss why they are in the C Tier.

  • 5-3-2: This formation consists of three defenders, one defensive midfielder, four midfielders, and two strikers. The main weakness of this formation is the lack of width in midfield, which can make it difficult to create wide attacking options and exploit the flanks. Additionally, the lone defensive midfielder may struggle to provide enough cover for the defense.

  • 5-2-3: This formation in football is a tactical setup that involves five defenders, two central midfielders, and three forwards. This formation is designed to create attacking opportunities while maintaining defensive stability. 

langtustore.com
loading..

Guess you ask